'His three works of fiction,
Tales of Firozsha Baag (1987),
Such a Long Jouney (1991) and
A Fine Balance (1995) are widely acclaimed to the extent of the last named work being nominated for the Booker Award 1996. That [Rohinton Mistry] did not finally get the award is as much a comment on the system of selection as on the quality of the other novels that figured in the final judgement. It is a case similar to that of V.S. Naipaul, that great West Indian writer of the second half of the twentieth century, being nominated for the Nobel Prize but not getting it though some writers of lesser merit have secured the award. Boris Pasternak, the Russian dissident writer with just one
Doctor Zhivago to boast of, would be a case in point.'
- M.L. Pandit, 'Fiction across Worlds' in
The Fiction of Rohinton Mistry ed. by Jaydipsinh Dodiya
(A bit dated, this book was published in 1998. Naipaul won the Nobel Prize in 2001.)
All award systems go the way of the Oscar - political, overly-touted, and often given to those not deserving of the spirit of the award. Not to say that Pasternak wasn't amazing (I don't know, I haven't read either
A Fine Balance or
Doctor Zhivago). But it's wonderfully hilarious that M.L. Pandit can make such a bold statement with such...nonchalance? No doubt, (assuming they would allow themselves to read something authored by a person whose name they couldn't pronounce) it would have lit a fire among the faculty members at UCL - 'reactionary' as that dumb-ass second examiner stated on my feedback report. And yet, if uttered at SOAS it would have hardly raised an eyebrow. Is subversivity (not subversion) the norm at SOAS? Which strikes me as absolutely ridiculous for the French philosophers that are so hallowed at UCL are so much more subversive, flaunting - in complex syntactical structures - their contempt for existing power structures. But then, they are European.
Is transgression still subversive if it is institutionalised and racialised?
Regularly shuttling back and forth between the enemy camps - UCL and SOAS - separated by less than 100 metres, it's hard not to sense the psychological clash of civilisations. Nothing is devoid of politics anymore. But given the choice, I would have opted for that of SOAS. I dislike UCL more and more everyday. Or maybe it's just my department. Regurgitation is not my forte.